Friday, October 16, 2009

Blog Action Day 2009 - Climate Change and the Beef Industry

This blog was meant to be published on October 15, 2009 for Blog Action Day, but I got caught up with other business and was not able to finish it.



Climate Change and the Beef Industry:


Talk about a controversial topic, the only discussion more heated than climate change is probably healthcare, and that's mainly here in the U.S.A. But for the last few years, everywhere you turned there was talk about global warming, climate change, and the world coming to an end because of it. And many people around the world were quick to point the finger at agriculture as the main reason for global warming, with or without scientific proof. But I'll get to that in a little bit; first let's discuss global warming in general.


There are countless numbers of studies and predictive models that are projecting the polar ice caps are melting more and more everyday and are causing or will cause sea levels to rise and what not. A large part of the discussion on global warming is due to the 2007 climate summary prepared by the U.N. But according to an article in the Wall Street Journal by Kimberley A. Strassel, there are more than 700 scientists who disagree with the U.N. -- 13 times the number who authored the U.N.'s 2007 report. Also, Dr. Kiminori Itoh, a Japanese environmental physical chemist who contributed to a U.N. climate report, dubs man-made warming "the worst scientific scandal in history". Another example of how the world's point of view is changing, New Zealand last year elected a new government, which immediately suspended the country's weeks-old cap-and-trade program. Furthermore, data shows that the earth's temperatures have flat-lined since 2001, despite growing concentrations of CO2 (June 26, 2009). All of this only adds to the fact that global warming is not all it's cracked up to be.



Now, to the matter at hand, let’s look at how the beef industry affects the environment (note the following list was originally compiled by Amanda Nolz - BEEF Daily blogger, they were too good not to include in this post):

1. American agriculture is sustainable for the future. In the United States, 98 percent of farms are family farms. Today's American farmer feeds about 144 people worldwide. 2009 versus 1960: 1.8 million less farms are feeding a U.S. population that has increased 61 percent. (Explore Beef)


2. According to the Environmental Protection Agency, the entire U.S. agriculture sector accounts for only 6 percent of annual U.S. greenhouse gas emissions. Of this, livestock production is estimated to account for 2.8 percent of total U.S. emissions. (EPA Climate Change Report)




3. If livestock production disappeared tomorrow, wouldn't we just be transporting more tofu around? And wouldn't we just be plowing and fertilizing the land to supply PETA's vegetarian utopia? (Center for Consumer Freedom)



4. Grazing animals on land not suitable for producing crops more than doubles the land area that can be used to produce food. If 1955 technology were used to produce the amount of beef raised today, 165 million acres of land would be needed - that's about the size of Texas! (Explore Beef)



5. Each year, outstanding ranching families are recognized through a prestigious award, the Environmental Stewardship Award Program. The award is presented each year by the National Cattlemen's Beef Association and The National Cattlemen's Foundation, and is sponsored by Dow AgroSciences and USDA's Natural Resources Conservation Service at the annual Cattle Industry Annual Convention. (Read about the regional winners at BEEF)



6. Cattle do more than just provide us with nutritious beef. They also make significant contributions to our lives... and the planet. Cattle convert inedible cellulose (grass) to nutritious beef. When cattle graze, the "aerate" the soil with their hooves, which allows more oxygen and water to enter. They also press grass seed into the soil, so it can start growing. They provide a natural fertilizer in the form of manure. Cattle also reduce the length of grass and brush when they graze, which is helpful in reducing the spread of wildfires since there is less flammable material. In addition, cattle primarily graze on grass, but they also eat waste products from food processing such as potato skins, distillers grains, fruit pits, almond hulls and sugar beet pulp. (Wow That Cow!)



7. Beef by-products enable us to use 99% of every beef animal, and these products are a part of our daily lives. Beef by-products include leather, candles, toothpaste, deodorants, crayons, textiles, cosmetics, rubber tires, insulin, high glass for magazines, asphalt, fertilizers, cement blocks, hydraulic brake fluid, car polishes and waxes, detergents, shaving cream, soaps, shampoo, paint, chewing gum, marshmallows, and the list goes on, and on, and on. Can you go a day without using a cattle by-product? (When is a Cow More Than a Cow?)



8. There are 29 cuts of beef that meet the government labeling guidelines for lean. Each one contains less than 10 grams of total fat, 4.5 grams or less of saturated fat, and less than 95 milligrams of cholesterol per 3.5 oz. serving. Calorie-for-calorie, beef is the most nutrient-dense food including nine essential nutrients, including a good source of zinc, iron and protein. And did you know, beef has the same heart-healthy fats as olive oil? (Beef, It's What's For Dinner)



9. According to a 1993 article in the Journal of Animal Science by J. Beckett and J. Oltjen, total livestock production accounts for just over 11 percent of all U.S. water use in the United States. This includes the water to grow crops fed to livestock, which accounts for 9.7 percent of all water use, and livestock consumption, at 1.2 percent of all water use. (Journal of Animal Science)



10. Rangelands and pastures provide forage and habitat for numerous wildlife species, including 20 million deer, 500,000 pronghorn antelope, 400,000 elk and 55,000 feral horses and burros. Last year, more than 2,000 ranchers and farmers entered into landowner agreements with the Partners for Fish and Wildlife Program. About a billion acres, or 55 percent of the total land surface in the United States, is rangeland, pasture and forages. (Beef, From Pasture to Plate)



After reading these 10 facts, it should be clear that Agriculture and the Beef industry are not harming the environment nor are they contributing to climate change of any kind. Farmers are the original environmentalists, they realized from the get go, that they had to treat the land and animals right, so that they could produce safe, healthly and nutritious products that are high in quality, not only to continue to be profitable and make a living, but because it was the right thing to do!

A lot of people criticize the technologies used by modern day agriculture, and say they are unsafe, unhealthy, and unnecessary. They usually base all of this on unfound or bias scientific information that was put together by somebody or a entity that got paid to put the information together (i.e. studies and reports from the Humane Society of the United States and PETA), instead of having accredited universities from all over the world do the unbiased research. They do this to put fear in the minds of the general public so that they can persuade them to follow their mantra of killing animal agricutlure forever, and will use any means necessary (just like methane gas from cows contributes to global warming).

Finally, farmers and ranchers deeply care about the environment and their animals. And with that, I will leave you with this:

"No greater purpose has any man than to tend the herd and till the sod, and leave behind him greater still, those acres leased to him by God" ~ Unkown

Thursday, October 15, 2009

Texas Constitutional Propositions for Nov 3rd ballot

I received an email the other day, talking about how prop's 1, 2, and 3 would raise your taxes if your a homeowner in Texas. This is not the case, below are some explanations of what the props are and how they will work. Take a look and decide for yourself, most state Ag organizations are in favor of 1, 2, 5, and all are in favor of prop 11!

Prop 1 - Allows towns and counties to issue bonds to build infrastructure to protect or promote the mission of a military installation through buffer areas. By acquiring buffer areas or open spaces adjacent to a military installation, this would prevent encroachment from urban sprawl and would facilitate the construction of infrastructure to protect or promote the mission of the military installation.

Basically, it would help to keep Military bases from getting squeezed by urban sprawl, and/or economic development, thereby keeping them from moving to another state. Yes, the city/town or county could issue bonds to pay for this and that means that taxes would more than likely have to be increased to pay for those bonds, but, in order for bonds to be issued, they must be voted on by the people of that community/county. And if you don't live next to a military base, then you should worry about it.

Vote Yes on Prop 1

Prop 2 - legislature authorized to provide for the ad valor em taxation of a residence homestead solely on the basis of the property's value as a residence homestead.

In previous years, the appraisal value of residence homesteads increased by 200 to 400 percent in a single year when arrived at by application of the highest and best use standard. This amendment would allow the legislature to provide for valuation of a residence homestead solely on the basis of its value as a homestead, eliminating the influence of consideration of the highest and best use.

This is pretty close to what existing property tax practices are now, but resembles the restrictions that already apply to agricultural and open-space land. Texas protects those types of properties from large appraisal increases resulting from consideration of the highest and best use. If does not similarly protect residence homesteads. This prop would extend such protection to homeowners whose neighborhoods are in transition from residential uses to commercial development. This would only apply to primary homes, and not second homes or investment properties.

In other words, your home would be appraised based on residential values and would not be based on commercial valuations, strictly residential appraisal and would not cause your taxes to rise.

Vote Yes on Prop 2

Prop 3 - Since appraisal districts/counties all over the state appraise similar properties in different ways, (i.e. mineral rights in West Texas might be worth more than mineral rights in East Texas), and this would allow the legislature to strengthen state oversight of appraisal district practices and procedures.

The only thing is, if this is passed, then the legislature would have to come up with more legislation on how to implement state enforcement authorized by the amendment, because they did not provide for this in this amendment.

Vote - NO - there is too much legislative gray area here.

Prop 5 - Would allow authorizing the legislature to authorize a single board of equalization for two or more adjoining appraisal entities that elect to provide for consolidated equalizations.

Basically it would allow rural areas/counties to put together a more qualified appraisal review board made up of members with more expertise to serve, where there are sometimes fewer qualified persons within one county.

Vote Yes on Prop 5

PROP 11 - Prohibits the taking, damaging, or destroying of private property for public use unless the action is for the ownership, use, and enjoyment of the property by the State, a political subdivision of the State, the public at large, or entities granted the power of eminent domain under law or for the elimination of urban blight on a particular parcel of property, but not for certain economic development or enhancement of tax revenue purposes, and to limit the legislature's authority to grant the power of eminent domain to an entity.

In a nutshell, this is the first step to stronger eminent domain REFORM in Texas. Texas has the most lacking eminent domain laws in the country. This is the reason why TxDot was and is still working on the Trans Texas Corridor (I-69, I-10, etc...), it’s not dead yet. Another example is the city of Austin has been or was condemning property for economic development in the last few years, which is currently legal, but this amendment would stop that from happening and keep it from happening again in the rest of the state.

We still need more eminent domain reform laws in the future, and should get them in the next legislative session in 2011, but until then, Prop 11 will go a long way in protecting the private property rights in Texas.

VOTE YES ON PROP 11 !!!!!!


The rest of the props aren't really that important to the rights of most Texans, they mainly deal with red tape. So vote on them based on your views.

Prop 6 - authorizing the Veterans' Land Board to issue general obligation bonds in amounts equal to or less than amounts previously authorized. This would cut through more red tape.

Prop 7 - Allow an officer or enlisted member of the Texas State Guard or other state militia or military force to hold other civil offices.

Prop 8 - Allow state to contribute money, property, and other resources for the establishment, maintenance, and operation of veteran’s hospitals in the state.

Prop 9 - Protect the right of the public to access and use public beaches on the seaward shore of the Gulf of Mexico.

Prop 10 - Elected members of the governing boards of emergency services districts may serve terms not to exceed four years.